New York Flu Watch: Real-Time Tracking and Analysis of Influenza Data

February 6, 2026
New York State New York City Influenza Communicable Diseases Epidemiology Data Visualization


Published: November 8, 2022
Updated: February 06, 2026 at 06:09PM



Welcome

Welcome to New York Flu Watch, a resource you can use to follow influenza activity across New York State and New York City in near real time. This page brings together multiple open data sources to give you a comprehensive view of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases, emergency department utilization, hospitalizations, mortality, and vaccination coverage. By drawing from statewide and city-level surveillance systems, you can explore how influenza patterns differ across regions, populations, and phases of the season. Whether you are making operational decisions, planning prevention efforts, or simply trying to stay informed, the analyses presented here are intended to help you interpret current trends with clarity and context.

Data Overview

You will find that the data presented on this page represent several complementary surveillance streams, each providing a different perspective on the burden and distribution of influenza. Laboratory-confirmed case data give you insight into virologically confirmed infections, while emergency department and hospitalization data highlight how many people are seeking care for influenza-related illness. Mortality data, drawn from federal vital statistics systems, show you how influenza contributes to severe outcomes across age groups and regions. Vaccination coverage data, collected through national surveys, allow you to assess how well communities are protected as the season unfolds. Together, these datasets form a layered picture of influenza activity, although each dataset has its own structure, strengths, and limitations.

How to Use These Data

You can refer to these data to understand where influenza activity is most prominent, how quickly it is increasing or decreasing, and which groups or geographic areas may be experiencing greater burden. By reviewing the maps, time trends, and age-stratified analyses, you can identify patterns that may warrant closer attention—such as early spikes in activity, regional disparities, or notable changes in healthcare use. These displays also help you compare the current season with historical patterns, an essential step in determining whether observed activity is typical or unusually elevated. Public health departments, hospital systems, and community organizations may find these outputs useful for situational awareness, resource planning, vaccination outreach, and communication with the public. Individuals can also use these data to make informed decisions about preventive behaviors, healthcare-seeking, and vaccination timing.

Why Are These Data Important?

Understanding influenza trends is crucial for protecting both individual and community health, and these data provide you with actionable insight into the timing, spread, and severity of each flu season. The data help you see when influenza begins circulating, how rapidly it grows, and which areas or groups experience higher levels of illness. These patterns support critical planning and response actions, such as reinforcing vaccination messaging, preparing healthcare facilities for increased demand, and identifying communities where additional outreach may be needed. Because influenza varies from year to year—and because vaccination uptake, population immunity, and circulating strains change over time—having timely and transparent data is essential for making informed policy and operational decisions. By following these indicators throughout the season, you can stay aware of emerging risks and understand how influenza is affecting New Yorkers in real time.

What Do These Data Show?

The figures and tables on this page show you how influenza is manifesting across multiple dimensions, including counts, rates, severity, and geographic variation. Laboratory-confirmed case data show where reported infections are occurring and how those patterns shift across weeks, regions, and influenza types. Emergency department visit and hospitalization data highlight the clinical burden of influenza-like illness on healthcare systems, an important marker of severity and system stress that may rise even when testing is incomplete. Mortality data show how influenza contributes to severe outcomes, allowing you to explore differences across age groups and regions. Vaccination coverage data give you a sense of how well-protected various populations may be, and whether coverage levels align with seasonal risk. Taken together, these outputs present a detailed and interconnected view of the influenza landscape.

What Do These Data Not Show?

Although these data provide valuable insights, they do not reflect the full extent of influenza activity in the population. Laboratory-confirmed cases capture only individuals who sought care, were tested, and received results that were reported to surveillance systems; many mild or moderate influenza infections occur outside of healthcare settings and are therefore not counted. Emergency department and hospitalization data reflect only the subset of people who became ill enough to seek urgent or inpatient care, so they do not represent all influenza-like illness in the community. Mortality data report deaths in which influenza or related conditions were identified on death certificates, but they do not capture all influenza-associated deaths, especially in cases where influenza was not tested for or recorded. Vaccination coverage data are based on survey responses and may be subject to recall error, nonresponse bias, or sampling variability. For these reasons, you should consider these data as highly useful indicators—but not complete measures—of influenza activity.

Implications for Public Health Practice

Using these data, you can better anticipate the needs of your community, guide prevention strategies, and strengthen preparedness for periods of increased respiratory illness. Trends in laboratory-confirmed cases and emergency department utilization can help you identify when activity is accelerating and when interventions such as vaccination messaging, testing reminders, or enhanced infection prevention practices may be most effective. Regional and age-specific analyses can help you target resources to populations or areas experiencing disproportionate impact, while vaccination coverage data can support efforts to reduce disparities in protection. Mortality patterns can inform high-level planning by highlighting groups that may be at increased risk for severe outcomes. By integrating these data into ongoing monitoring efforts, you can support timely public health action, promote community resilience, and enhance the overall response to influenza across New York State.



Executive Summary1

Date: February 06, 2026
Subject: Influenza Surveillance Update: Declining Influenza A and Rising Influenza B Activity

Statewide surveillance data indicate that the intense peak of the 2025-2026 influenza season, driven by Influenza A, has passed. Laboratory-confirmed Influenza A cases have been in decline for six consecutive weeks. However, a notable emerging signal is the steady, concurrent increase in Influenza B cases, which reached a season high in the most recent reporting week. This pattern could indicate a late-season wave of influenza activity dominated by a different strain. The overall intensity of the season to date has been substantial compared to recent, non-pandemic years.

The temporal trend in laboratory-confirmed cases illustrates this transition. Influenza A cases peaked during the week ending December 20, 2025, with 71,578 cases reported statewide. Since that peak, cases have decreased by 95.6% to 3,185 cases for the week ending January 31, 2026. Conversely, Influenza B cases have consistently increased, rising from 1,014 cases during the Influenza A peak to a season high of 1,830 cases in the most recent reporting week (+80.5%). This shift in predominant strain is a critical feature of the current epidemiological landscape.

Early-season cumulative data (through October 4, 2025) showed geographic disparities, with the highest incidence rates at that time concentrated in the Long Island (2,264.7 per 100,000) and Mid-Hudson (2,067.8 per 100,000) regions. Syndromic surveillance from New York City, available through November 8, 2025, provided an early signal of increasing activity; the percentage of emergency department visits for influenza more than doubled from 0.23% to 0.47% in a single week. This increase preceded the larger statewide wave of Influenza A. More recent syndromic data are needed to assess the healthcare impact of the current rise in Influenza B. Mortality data for the current season are not yet available, but data from the prior season provide a benchmark, showing a peak of 91 influenza-associated deaths during the week ending December 24, 2022.

These transmission dynamics are occurring in the context of potentially lower population immunity. The most recent influenza vaccine coverage estimates, from February 2025, show a decline in uptake across all age groups compared to the previous season. For instance, coverage among adults aged 50-64 was estimated at 44.8%, a substantial decrease from 51.9% the prior year. Similarly, coverage for children aged 5-12 years declined from 65.0% to 59.5%. While these ecological data do not establish a direct causal link, reduced vaccine-mediated immunity may be a contributing factor to the season’s intensity. Continued close monitoring of Influenza B circulation and its impact on healthcare capacity is recommended.



Laboratory-Confirmed Cases of Influenza in New York State


Spatial Distribution


Incidence

This map displays the number of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases reported in each county during the current flu season. Counties are shaded on a gradient from light to darker color according to the total number of cases, and each county is labeled with its exact count to support quick reference. The design helps highlight geographic differences in reported influenza activity, allowing readers to see where larger or smaller numbers of confirmed cases are concentrated across the state. Because the map reflects only laboratory-confirmed infections, it should be interpreted as an indicator of reported activity rather than a full measure of all influenza illness, which may include many untested or mild cases.

Color-shaded map of New York State showing laboratory-confirmed influenza case counts by county. Darker shades indicate higher numbers of confirmed cases, and each county is labeled with its case count. Map Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Back to top


Incidence Rate

This map shows influenza incidence rates—cases per 100,000 residents—calculated for each county during the current flu season. By adjusting counts for population size, the map makes it possible to compare influenza activity more fairly across counties with very different population levels. A color gradient is used to display these rates, and each county is labeled with its rate to aid interpretation. This approach highlights where the burden of influenza is proportionally highest, which can support planning for local prevention, outreach, and preparedness efforts. As with all laboratory-based surveillance, these rates depend on testing practices and healthcare use, which may differ across regions.

Color-shaded map of New York State showing influenza incidence rates per 100,000 residents by county. Darker shades indicate higher incidence rates, and each county is labeled with its rate. Map Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Back to top


Longitudinal Trend

This figure shows weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in New York State, separated by influenza type and displayed across multiple seasons beginning in 2009. Each panel focuses on a single influenza type, allowing readers to follow long-term patterns in circulation for that type. Bars representing previous seasons are shown in one color, while bars for the current season appear in another, making it easy to distinguish this year’s activity from historical trends. Because the display spans more than a decade of surveillance, it provides context for understanding the timing, scale, and variability of influenza seasons. The interactive format includes optional tooltips showing the week ending date, influenza type, and reported case count, supporting deeper exploration of the data. As with the maps, these counts reflect laboratory-confirmed infections and do not capture all influenza illness.

Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Back to top


Seasonality

This figure displays weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases across multiple seasons, separated into panels by influenza type. Each line represents a complete flu season, with the current season distinguished through color, alpha level, and point size to make it visually identifiable without obscuring historical context. By aligning all seasons on the CDC week calendar, the figure provides a consistent structure that supports comparisons of timing and relative magnitude across influenza types. The interactive tooltips provide season-specific details when a user hovers over any point, making it easier to connect visual elements with precise numeric values. Overall, the design helps public health practitioners quickly situate current-season activity within a long-term historical framework.

Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Back to top


By Region

This graphic displays influenza case counts across CDC weeks, separated simultaneously by region and influenza type. Organizing the output into a grid allows each region to be read horizontally while influenza types appear in vertical groupings, helping users navigate spatial and virologic differences without mixing scales. Visual distinctions such as color, alpha, and point size differentiate the current season from previous seasons while avoiding clutter in panels that contain many overlapping lines. Axis limits are allowed to vary independently across panels so that smaller regions and less common influenza types are not visually compressed. This structure is useful for identifying regional operational needs, ensuring that quieter panels remain interpretable and that areas with higher activity are not minimized by statewide scaling.

Grid of line charts displaying influenza case counts, organized with regions as rows and influenza types as columns. Each panel shows multiple seasons, with the current season visually differentiated. Axes scale independently to maintain readability in regions with different population sizes. The layout supports comparison of case patterns across both disease types and geographic regions. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Regions include the following counties:
Capital Region: Albany, Columbia, Greene, Saratoga, Schenectady, Rensselaer, Warren, Washington
Central New York: Cayuga, Cortland, Madison, Onondaga, Oswego
Finger Lakes: Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Orleans, Seneca, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Long Island: Nassau, Suffolk
Mid-Hudson: Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan, Ulster, Westchester
Mohawk Valley: Fulton, Herkimer, Montgomery, Oneida, Otsego, Schoharie
New York City: Bronx, Kings, New York, Richmond, Queens
North Country: Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Hamilton, Jefferson, Lewis, St. Lawrence
Southern Tier: Broome, Chemung, Chenango, Delaware, Schuyler, Steuben, Tioga, Tompkins
Western New York: Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, Niagara


Back to top


Cases in New York City, by Age Group

This figure presents weekly case counts for New York City, organized by age group in a single-row grid. Using bars rather than lines emphasizes absolute counts and the week-to-week shifts commonly reviewed in surveillance operations. Placing each age group in its own panel prevents larger age groups from dominating the scale and helps readers evaluate patterns within each demographic category. Aligning the x-axes allows for straightforward temporal comparison across groups without requiring them to share a single y-axis. The design supports age-specific operational planning and communication by presenting counts in a format that can be scanned quickly.

Set of bar charts displaying weekly influenza case counts for New York City, arranged by age group. Each age group appears in its own panel with a shared date axis. The use of separate panels prevents large age groups from dominating the scale and supports age-specific interpretation. Bars represent counts for each week. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top


County-Level Data

This table brings together county-level influenza indicators in a format that supports both detailed review and high-level comparison. Columns include counts, incidence rates, and population denominators, along with sparklines that summarize current and historical trends in a compressed, visual form. Color shading highlights counties with higher case counts or rates, while grouped sections under tab spanners organize the table into meaningful conceptual blocks such as cumulative incidence and trend history. Sparklines are particularly useful for spotting unusual seasonal trajectories that might not be immediately apparent from the numeric fields alone. The table’s structure enables users to explore geographic variation efficiently while retaining access to underlying numerical detail.

Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza in New York State
Data through week ending: January 31, 2026
County

Current Season Cumulative Incidence

Current Season Incidence Rate

Trends
Influenza A Influenza B Influenza Unspecified Total Cases Population Total Cases per 100,000 Population Current Season (2025-2026) Previous Seasons (2009-2010 through 2024-2025)
Capital Region Albany 2,686 290 56 3,032 319,964 947.61 98.0 18.0
Columbia 485 32 4 521 60,299 864.03 9.0 0.0
Greene 508 53 2 563 46,903 1,200.35 22.0 0.0
Rensselaer 1,355 173 59 1,587 160,749 987.25 65.0 6.0
Saratoga 2,100 828 82 3,010 240,360 1,252.29 90.0 14.0
Schenectady 1,970 286 24 2,280 162,261 1,405.14 56.0 8.0
Warren 507 91 60 658 65,288 1,007.84 37.0 1.0
Washington 516 149 29 694 59,839 1,159.78 30.0 3.0
Central New York Cayuga 1,011 27 17 1,055 74,567 1,414.83 20.0 10.0
Cortland 612 31 1 644 45,945 1,401.68 20.0 7.0
Madison 685 55 49 789 67,072 1,176.35 39.0 7.0
Onondaga 6,005 491 10 6,506 469,812 1,384.81 269.0 130.0
Oswego 2,588 54 2 2,644 118,305 2,234.90 39.0 18.0
Finger Lakes Genesee 669 7 0 676 57,604 1,173.53 5.0 3.0
Livingston 722 14 0 736 61,561 1,195.56 12.0 2.0
Monroe 10,947 297 2 11,246 752,202 1,495.08 146.0 51.0
Ontario 1,492 95 1 1,588 113,012 1,405.16 77.0 9.0
Orleans 437 6 0 443 39,686 1,116.26 4.0 1.0
Seneca 360 3 0 363 32,650 1,111.79 11.0 4.0
Wayne 1,293 18 0 1,311 90,757 1,444.52 21.0 4.0
Wyoming 337 6 0 343 39,588 866.42 5.0 1.0
Yates 171 4 0 175 24,387 717.60 8.0 0.00
Long Island Nassau 30,092 1,314 2,109 33,515 1,392,438 2,406.93 386.0 125.0
Suffolk 29,061 1,146 2,595 32,802 1,535,909 2,135.67 438.0 87.0
Mid-Hudson Dutchess 4,212 151 391 4,754 299,963 1,584.86 74.0 12.0
Orange 8,660 232 15 8,907 411,767 2,163.12 127.0 13.0
Putnam 2,581 43 144 2,768 98,409 2,812.75 22.0 4.0
Rockland 6,258 217 7 6,482 348,144 1,861.87 99.0 13.0
Sullivan 1,784 11 5 1,800 80,450 2,237.41 19.0 2.0
Ulster 1,822 109 72 2,003 182,977 1,094.67 48.0 16.0
Westchester 21,874 599 1,022 23,495 1,006,447 2,334.45 300.0 116.0
Mohawk Valley Fulton 755 58 0 813 52,073 1,561.27 37.0 2.0
Herkimer 761 31 0 792 59,585 1,329.19 31.0 28.0
Montgomery 748 91 0 839 49,648 1,689.90 56.0 3.0
Oneida 3,852 144 47 4,043 228,347 1,770.55 96.0 26.0
Otsego 852 30 0 882 60,524 1,457.27 30.0 5.0
Schoharie 419 30 2 451 30,151 1,495.80 11.0 1.00
New York City Bronx 29,945 700 21 30,666 1,384,724 2,214.59 281.0 85.0
Kings 41,735 909 139 42,783 2,617,631 1,634.42 393.0 127.0
New York 19,565 667 154 20,386 1,660,664 1,227.58 350.0 115.0
Queens 40,433 996 1,058 42,487 2,316,841 1,833.83 369.0 147.0
Richmond 8,611 272 909 9,792 498,212 1,965.43 83.0 23.0
North Country Clinton 579 14 17 610 77,871 783.35 12.0 1.0
Essex 318 12 4 334 36,744 908.99 28.0 1.0
Franklin 533 22 0 555 47,086 1,178.69 23.0 0.0
Hamilton 34 1 0 35 5,082 688.71 2.0 0.00
Jefferson 1,547 35 18 1,600 113,140 1,414.18 26.0 62.0
Lewis 474 1 0 475 26,570 1,787.73 11.0 4.0
St Lawrence 1,273 24 2 1,299 106,198 1,223.19 17.0 3.0
Southern Tier Broome 2,427 87 0 2,514 196,397 1,280.06 88.0 14.0
Chemung 1,126 49 0 1,175 81,115 1,448.56 53.0 9.0
Chenango 624 21 0 645 45,776 1,409.04 26.0 3.0
Delaware 611 29 0 640 44,191 1,448.26 13.0 3.0
Schuyler 192 6 0 198 17,121 1,156.47 13.0 1.00
Steuben 1,522 18 0 1,540 92,015 1,673.64 34.0 6.0
Tioga 470 19 0 489 47,574 1,027.87 36.0 0.0
Tompkins 859 43 1 903 105,602 855.10 119.0 20.0
Western New York Allegany 474 46 0 520 47,299 1,099.39 44.0 1.0
Cattaraugus 468 26 0 494 75,475 654.52 6.0 9.0
Chautauqua 1,032 48 1 1,081 124,105 871.04 64.0 13.0
Erie 8,969 473 1 9,443 950,602 993.37 87.0 42.0
Niagara 2,251 110 0 2,361 209,570 1,126.59 58.0 19.0
Data as of: February 06, 2026

Table Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: Health Data NY


Back to top




Visits to the Emergency Department that have an Influenza Diagnosis, New York City


Overall

This graphic uses bars to show the proportion of emergency department visits identified as influenza over time. Presenting percentages rather than counts aligns the output with situational awareness needs, given that ED volumes fluctuate independently of influenza activity. The consistent date axis allows users to track changes across the observation window without scrolling through multiple displays. The bar format highlights peaks and troughs clearly and helps users understand when influenza contributes to a larger share of ED visits. This structure is appropriate for hospital operations and incident command, where proportional measures often guide staffing and resource decisions.

Bar chart showing the weekly percentage of New York City emergency department visits attributed to influenza. Bars represent the influenza share of total ED visits, using a single statewide date axis. The chart highlights proportional burden rather than raw counts, supporting operational planning and situational awareness. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top


By Age Group

This output extends the previous figure by disaggregating influenza-related ED visit percentages into age-specific panels. Separate facets prevent any one age group from dominating the scale and allow each demographic category to be evaluated on its own terms. Because each panel shares the same date axis, users can compare timing and magnitude across groups without forcing them onto a single shared y-axis. This design highlights demographic differences that may be relevant for outreach, messaging, or pediatric versus adult capacity planning. The consistent structure also ensures that new weekly data integrate seamlessly into the long-term view.

Series of bar charts displaying the percentage of ED visits associated with influenza, separated by age group. Each panel includes bars for weekly values on a shared date axis. The faceted layout enables comparisons across age groups while maintaining independent y-scales for interpretability. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top


By Borough

This chart follows the same bar-based design but organizes results by borough to highlight differences in geographic distribution within the city. Each panel represents a single borough, enabling local context to be examined without the confounding effects of borough population size. Since the panels are displayed side-by-side, users can compare general patterns while retaining the ability to focus on any one borough’s operational profile. Presenting percentages ensures compatibility with borough-level ED utilization patterns, which can differ substantially. This layout supports planning efforts that require borough-level granularity.

Bar charts showing borough-level percentages of ED visits linked to influenza. Each borough is presented in its own panel, sharing the same date axis but with separate y-scales. The design highlights geographic differences in relative burden across boroughs. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top




Hospitalizations from the Emergency Department that have an Influenza Diagnosis, New York City


Overall

This figure reports the proportion of emergency department visits that result in hospitalization with influenza as the identified condition. Using a bar format emphasizes weekly shifts in the metric and the relative burden influenza places on inpatient services. Because hospitalizations represent a downstream outcome of ED activity, displaying the values over time supports assessments of severity and healthcare system impact. The consistent date axis ensures interpretability across updates, while the uncluttered single-panel layout provides a clear view of trends for decision-making.

Bar chart showing the percentage of ED visits that result in hospitalization with influenza as the identified condition. Bars represent weekly values across a consistent date axis. The format emphasizes severity and inpatient impact rather than testing volume. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top


By Age Group

This visualization applies the previous measure to age-specific subpopulations. Organizing the figure as a set of facets ensures that the hospitalization percentages for each age group are not visually dominated by other demographic categories. The structure allows users to compare the relative burden among children, adults, and older adults using shared time points across the panels. Presenting the information as a percentage rather than a count also aligns it with operational concerns about severity rather than testing volume. This format is helpful for age-focused clinical guidance and capacity planning.

Set of bar charts showing the percentage of ED visits leading to hospitalization for influenza, separated by age group. Each panel contains weekly bars on a shared date axis. The faceted structure highlights differences in hospitalization proportions across demographic groups. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top


By Borough

This graphic presents the borough-specific percentages of ED visits resulting in hospitalization due to influenza. The faceted layout separates boroughs into individual panels, giving each geographic unit a consistent visual space. This structure makes it easier to observe how hospitalization proportions differ across boroughs without forcing them onto a unified scale that might distort local patterns. The bar format ensures that shifts in relative burden are noticeable at a glance. The design is well suited for borough-level preparedness and situational awareness reporting.

Bar charts displaying borough-specific percentages of ED visits that result in influenza-associated hospitalization. Each borough appears in its own panel, using a shared date axis. The layout supports geographic comparison of hospitalization burden. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Back to top




Influenza Mortality


Overall

This chart displays weekly provisional counts of influenza deaths in New York State. Using bars creates a clear delineation between weeks and supports rapid identification of changes in mortality burden over time. The single statewide panel keeps the focus on aggregate impact rather than regional distribution. Presenting the measure on a consistent weekly axis ensures that new data integrate smoothly and the overall structure remains stable across reporting periods. The design is appropriate for communicating mortality burden to both professional audiences and the public.

Bar chart showing statewide weekly counts of provisional influenza deaths. Each bar represents a week, aligned on a continuous date axis. The single-panel design focuses on statewide mortality burden over time. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: National Center for Health Statistics


Back to top


By Region

This figure expands statewide mortality data by stacking regions within each weekly bar. Stacking preserves the total count for each week while showing how mortality is distributed across regions, making it suitable for reviewing the relative contribution of different areas. Because the y-axis remains consistent across the entire display, the figure maintains interpretability despite regional variation. The legend placed at the top improves readability and supports quick identification of regional contributions. This approach helps users understand how mortality burden shifts geographically over time.

Stacked bar chart displaying weekly statewide influenza mortality with colored segments for each region. Each bar reflects the total deaths for a week, with stacked segments indicating regional contributions. The design highlights geographic distribution while retaining statewide totals. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: National Center for Health Statistics


Back to top


By Age Group

This chart organizes provisional mortality counts by age group using a stacked format. The design preserves total weekly counts while showing how deaths are distributed across demographic categories. Using a shared weekly time axis ensures comparability across reporting periods and simplifies interpretation of the evolving burden. The stacked arrangement is particularly valuable for highlighting which age groups contribute most to mortality at different points in the season. This presentation supports age-focused prevention and communication efforts.

Stacked bar chart showing weekly influenza death counts by age group. Each week appears as a bar with color-coded segments for each age category. The layout maintains total weekly counts while illustrating age-specific contributions to mortality. Graph Prepared By: Isaac H. Michaels, DrPH
Data Source: National Center for Health Statistics


Back to top




Influenza Vaccination Coverage

This display shows vaccination coverage estimates across months for several influenza seasons, separated by age group. Lines represent estimated monthly coverage, while error bars display 95% confidence intervals to communicate uncertainty inherent in survey-based estimates. Faceting places each age group in its own row and each season in its own column, creating a matrix that helps users examine how coverage evolves within and across seasons. The consistent y-axis scaling from 0 to 100% ensures that trends remain interpretable even when estimates vary substantially by age group. Color gradients tied to coverage values allow users to quickly locate higher and lower coverage points without overshadowing the error bars. This structure is particularly helpful for assessing program performance and identifying age groups that may benefit from targeted vaccination campaigns.



  1. This executive summary was generated by an AI summarizer agent and reviewed by an editor agent. I review any summaries flagged for revision.↩︎

Daily Shelter Census — New York City (DHS Daily Report)

February 11, 2026
homelessness New York City shelter census time series public health DHS

A concise analysis of daily counts of people and families in New York City's Department of Homeless Services (DHS) shelter system. This page summarizes trends, weekly patterns, and recent changes using daily shelter census data and highlights implications for public health practice.

Read more →

New York Racing Horse Death Report

February 11, 2026
New York State Animal Welfare Equine Fatality Analysis

This report utilizes data from the New York State Gaming Commission to analyze equine fatalities at race tracks, uncovering trends and patterns to enhance horse safety and welfare. Despite limitations like potential underreporting and data quality issues, the report offers critical insights into the…

Read more →

Spatial Distribution of Hospital Beds in New York State

February 11, 2026
New York State Hospitals Health Care Delivery GIS Preparedness

Explore an interactive map showcasing the spatial distribution of certified hospital beds across New York State. This map visualizes the number of beds available for various service lines, such as Medical/Surgical, Intensive Care, Neonatal Care, and more. Users can zoom, pan, and hover for detailed …

Read more →